5 edition of Maintaining effective deterrence found in the catalog.
Maintaining effective deterrence
Colin S. Gray
by Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College in [Carlisle Barracks, PA]
Written in English
|Statement||Colin S. Gray.|
|Contributions||Army War College (U.S.). Strategic Studies Institute.|
|LC Classifications||U162.6 .G694 2003|
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||xi, 55 p. ;|
|Number of Pages||55|
|LC Control Number||2003373301|
As Mr. Wohlstetter reminds the bishops, there is no effective deterrence without the capability, intention, and will to resist nuclear aggression with nuclear means if deterrence should fail. A bluff deterrent cannot convey this resolve, particularly for the protracted period that even the most optimistic expectations of arms-control progress. to make deterrence effective in the subcontinent. Theories of Deterrence Deterrence is an old phenomenon which received new signifi- cance with the development of the atomic bomb. Discussions of deterrence often start with a Roman proverb, Si vis pacem, para bellum: If one wants peace, prepare for war (Luttwak 1).File Size: 2MB.
Modern deterrence theories were conceived in the aftermath of World War I. Given the human and political carnage associated with the Great War, it was natural for historians, military strategists, policy analysts, diplomats, and politicians to try to understand why the breakdown occurred. The standard interpretation of the coming of World War I provided the intellectual Author: Stephen L. Quackenbush, Frank C. Zagare. Download Maintaining Effective Deterrence Book - Duration: 19 seconds. 1 view; 3 years ago; Download Lectures on QCD Foundations and Applications Lecture Notes in Physics Book - .
1 | Army Modernization Strategy outlining a more holistic approach to modernization while maintaining continuity of priorities. effective deterrence and competition short of armed conflict File Size: 2MB. The Air Force is responsible for maintaining effective forces with the capability to support national security deterrence goals of deterring adversaries from attacking the US and its interests with their nuclear arsenals or other weapons of mass destruction (WMD); dissuading competitors from developing WMD; assuring allies and partners of the Brand: Progressive Management.
Art of the paperback
Peter Coker, paintings and drawing of the butchers shop
Business driven information systems
The 2000 Import and Export Market for Quartz, Mica, Felspar, Fluorspar, Cryolithe, and Chiolithe in North Korea (World Trade Report)
Group politics and public policy
The deadly messiah
NATIONALISM AND FEMINISM IN LATE COLONIAL INDIA: THE RANI OF JHANSI REGIMENT, 1943-1945
The campaigns of 1812, 1813, 1814 and 1815, also the causes and consequences of the French revolution
Ulster Unionist Party
Saratoga National Historical Park, Stillwater and Saratoga, New York
Product liability case digest
Maintaining Effective Deterrence Hardcover See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions. Price New from Used from Hardcover "Please retry" — — $1, Hardcover from $1, 1 Used Format: Hardcover. Maintaining Effective Deterrence [Gray, Colin S., Institute, Strategic Studies] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
Maintaining Effective DeterrenceAuthor: Colin S. Gray. Get this from a library. Maintaining effective deterrence. [Colin S Gray; Army War College (U.S.). Strategic Studies Institute.] -- While deterrence is as old as human conflict itself, it became particularly important with the advent of nuclear weapons when armed conflict between the superpowers had the potential to end.
ing deterrence―or, more accurately, the psychology of deterrence― and policy guidance on how the United States can most effectively use it. He concludes that an adaptable and flexible military with robust landpower is the only tool that can maintain deterrence.
The Strategic Studies Institute is pleased to offer this monograph as part. Effective extended deterrence has several components relating to allies, adversaries, and potential adversaries; allies in the Asia-Pacific are critical to maintaining the region’s confidence in the US commitment and the Republic of Korea (ROK), the United States has expanded the scope of Maintaining effective deterrence book discussions to.
The Future of US. The NPR Report issued by the Obama administration in April cited five key objectives: prevent nuclear proliferation and nuclear terrorism, reduce the role of nuclear weapons, maintain strategic deterrence at reduced nuclear force levels, strengthen regional deterrence, and sustain a safe, secure, and effective nuclear arsenal.
The greatest innovation in the field of nuclear strategy is probably the concept of expanded deterrence – that is, deterrence aimed at governments that support terrorist organizations: this is Maintaining effective deterrence book of the two possible responses which have been conceived to counter the risk of a terrorist use of WMDs, the other being preventive war (Gallucci, 52).
Deterrence theory is the idea that an inferior force, by virtue of the destructive power of the force's weapons, could deter a more powerful adversary, provided that this force could be protected against destruction by a surprise attack.
This doctrine gained increased prominence as a military strategy during the Cold War with regard to the use of nuclear weapons and is related to, but. In such a context, it is worth noting that Terence Roehrig’s latest book, Japan, South Korea, and the United States Nuclear Umbrella: Deterrence After the Cold War, is the only comprehensive text exclusively focused on Japan and South Korea’s relationship to the U.S.
nuclear deterrent As the policy world agonizes over the future of a. Haney told the committee modernization is absolutely vital to maintaining an effective nuclear deterrent. “The real key to deterrence is the perception of your adversary. Your adversary has to understand that you have not just a safe, secure and effective, but a ready and reliable and credible capability,” he said.
U.S. NUclear aNd exteNded deterreNce: considerations and challenges Foreign Policy at BROOKINGS arms control Series Paper 3 • May Steven Pifer Richard C. Bush Vanda Felbab-Brown Martin S. IndykFile Size: KB. Post-Cold War Conflict Deterrence, by National Research Council Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications (page images and partial HTML at NAP) Rethinking deterrence and arms control / (Canberra: Strategic and Defence Studies Centre, ), by B.
Brett and Australian National University. Strategic and Defence Studies. effective cyber deterrence strategy for employing all elements of national power to In his book Deterrence, Lawrence Press concluded, “The key to maintaining credibility in military crisis, therefore, lies in possessing military power.” File Size: 2MB.
Total National Defence is suited to maintaining only a small conventional Force, but with a larger Reserve Force deployed across Guyana’s ten administrative regions. It is an effective means of ensuring deterrence and defence in a small state against the threats by external foes with larger and superior equipment.
Does The US Army in Multi-Domain Operations lack a clear theory of victory. A comparative analysis of the development of MDO and the historical concepts of Active Defense and AirLand Battle reveals the necessity of greater insight into sources of Russian and Chinese behavior and countering mechanisms, what constitutes effective deterrence, and greater clarity regarding.
The Minimum Credible Deterrence (MCD; officially named N-deterrence), is a defence and strategic principle on which the atomic weapons programme of Pakistan is based. This doctrine is not a part of the nuclear doctrine, which is designed for the use of the atomic weapons in a full-scale declared war if the conditions of the doctrine are surpassed.
A contemporary primer on the leading arguments about U.S. national security, National Security Dilemmas addresses the major challenges and opportunities that are live-issue areas for American policymakers and strategists today.
Colin S. Gray provides an in-depth analysis of a policy and strategy for deterrence; the long-term U.S. bid to transform its armed forces’. Read chapter 1 Deterrence: An Overview: Deterrence as a strategic concept evolved during the Cold War. Our perceptions of what it takes to achieve effective deterrence may be different from the perceptions of those we are trying to deter.
the dilemma between enunciating clear deterrence policies and maintaining ambiguity in situations. Philip P. Purpura, in Security and Loss Prevention (Seventh Edition), Rational Choice Theory. Rational choice theory, developed by Cornish and Clark (), is linked to deterrence theory in that individuals make rational decisions to avoid punishment and criminal sanctions that deter them.
Major elements of rational choice theory are that individuals (1) study the. Deterrence Is a Superstition when the Reagan Administration was cavalierly maintaining the feasibility of surviving a nuclear war with the. The NPR claims that “in the absence of U.S. nuclear deterrence, the United States, its allies, and partners would be vulnerable to coercion and attack by adversaries who retain or expand nuclear arms and increasingly lethal non-nuclear capabilities.” As the NPR points out, “U.S.
nuclear capabilities have made essential contributions to the deterrence of nuclear .Japan's alliance with the U.S. will only grow in importance amid the increasingly difficult security situation surrounding our country, thus I think it is necessary to keep the marines in Okinawa, a geographically strategic location from the standpoint of maintaining deterrence.ARTICLE.
What Are Nuclear Weapons For? John S. Foster, Jr. Keith B. Payne. Recently there has been a round of initiatives advocating the long-term elimination of nuclear weapons and/or their near-term reduction to small numbers. With the end of the Cold War, many thoughtful people understandably ask why the United States should continue to maintain nuclear weapons.